By Martin Namasaka
The recent decision by USAID to withdraw or scale down its aid programmes in Africa has reignited the long-standing debate: does foreign aid help or harm the continent? For decades, Africa has been a major recipient of development assistance, yet many of its nations continue to grapple with economic stagnation, weak institutions, and chronic aid dependency. With the U.S. stepping back, it is time for African governments to rethink their approach to development financing.
Critics of foreign aid argue that, despite the billions funneled into sub-Saharan Africa, economic growth has lagged behind. Over the past 50 years, GDP per capita in many recipient countries has actually declined. The well-intentioned inflow of aid often ends up propping up inefficient regimes, distorting local economies, and discouraging governments from investing in long-term self-sufficiency. Instead of fostering economic independence, aid has created a vicious cycle where governments rely on external handouts rather than fostering domestic resource mobilization and structural reforms.
One of the most damaging effects of aid has been the erosion of African bureaucracies. Initially, the postcolonial aid regime emphasized developmental planning, requiring recipient governments to formulate economic blueprints to justify funding. However, as planning flaws became evident in the 1970s, donors began bypassing national institutions, creating parallel administrative structures that drained local talent. Highly skilled bureaucrats left government jobs paying an average of $250 a month for donor-funded projects that offered salaries ranging from $3,000 to $6,000. This brain drain weakened state institutions, leaving governments with diminished capacity to drive their own development agendas.
The accountability dilemma is another crucial factor. Governments primarily reliant on tax revenues are accountable to their citizens. In contrast, those dependent on foreign aid answer to donors rather than their own people. When states prioritize donor demands over local needs, public trust in governance erodes, further alienating citizens from the development process. Programmes such as the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) were supposed to promote country ownership of development strategies, but in reality, they reinforced the influence of donors, NGOs, and technocrats rather than empowering grassroots institutions.
The most glaring problem of prolonged aid is the culture of dependency it fosters. Several African nations, including Malawi, Zambia, and Ghana, have historically relied on aid for more than 40% of their government expenditure. When aid becomes a permanent fixture rather than a temporary boost, governments lose the incentive to implement necessary reforms. Decades of financial rescue packages have conditioned some states to expect perpetual external assistance, weakening their ability to adapt to economic and political shocks. Worse still, a reliance on aid signals to private investors that these economies are high-risk, further stifling local enterprise and foreign direct investment.
Yet, aid is not inherently harmful. The case of Botswana demonstrates that, if used strategically, it can be a catalyst for development. At independence, Botswana relied on aid for nearly 60% of its Gross National Product (GNP), yet by 1997, that figure had dropped to 3%. How did Botswana succeed where many others failed? First, the country established a strong Ministry of Finance and Development Planning (MFDP), which carefully integrated aid into national priorities. Rather than letting donors dictate the agenda, Botswana ensured that every aid-funded project aligned with its long-term strategy. The government was also willing to reject aid that did not align with its vision, reinforcing national ownership of development initiatives. Furthermore, Botswana gradually shifted from donor reliance to domestic resource mobilization, reducing its exposure to donor volatility and external economic shocks.
While USAID’s withdrawal may be a major shift, it is important to recognize that other donors, may follow suit. The global landscape is becoming increasingly inward-looking, with donors prioritizing domestic economic issues and geopolitical interests. The European Union, for example, is reassessing its aid commitments in light of rising economic pressures at home. China, another key player in Africa, is also recalibrating its engagement, shifting towards a more investment-driven approach rather than direct aid. This growing inward focus among donors reinforces the urgency for Africa to become self-reliant.
Multilateral institutions such as the African Development Bank (AfDB) can play a crucial role in filling gaps left by bilateral donors. Unlike bilateral aid, which is often driven by political interests, multilateral funding is generally more structured and geared towards long-term development. These institutions can help African nations access concessional financing, technical expertise, and investment in infrastructure, governance, and human capital. However, African governments must ensure that engagement with multilaterals aligns with national development priorities rather than donor-driven agendas.
The termination of USAID’s operations in Africa should not be viewed as a tragedy but as an opportunity for Africa to reset its development trajectory. The narrative must shift from aid dependence to self-sufficiency. This is a chance for African governments to strengthen their fiscal policies, invest in domestic industries, and foster environments conducive to entrepreneurship and investment. Countries that have successfully transitioned away from aid reliance demonstrate that it is possible to build resilient economies through strategic planning and strong governance.
Rather than mourning the loss of aid, African leaders should celebrate this as the push needed to finally take full ownership of their economic futures. The era of perpetual dependency must end, and this moment presents a unique chance to break free from the cycles of foreign reliance. By prioritizing domestic resource mobilization, strengthening institutions, and leveraging multilateral partnerships wisely, Africa can build a future where aid is no longer a necessity but an option. The sooner Africa embraces this reality, the closer it will be to achieving long-term prosperity.
Share this content:
4 Comments